Ohh he had waited calmly, his patience only stretched and tempered with hope; he could not know her past joyful-pain… could not conceive her future hopeful-pain…
Monthly Archives: December 2021
Book Review: Achievement Addiction by Justine Toh
What’s could be wrong with getting things done – and done really well? Justine Toh asks the hard questions about our addiction to achievement and where grace fits into it all.
Tribute to Ian Hore-Lacy (1940-2021)
Tributes to Ian Hore-Lacy, whose tragic death last week left was a shock and loss to many. Ian was a former Ethos board member, ongoing faithful supporter and friendly critic.
LESSONS WE CAN LEARN FROM THE KYLE RITTENHOUSE TRIAL
The persistent narrative: A seventeen year old ’white supremacist,’ ‘gun-mad,’ ‘active shooter,’ ‘mass shooter,’ ‘vigilante,’ and ‘white terrorist,’ was driven by his mother across state lines. Using an illegal AR-15, he violently intervened in a ‘fiery but mostly peaceful’ Black Lives Matter protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin. He wantonly killed two innocent black BLM supporters, that, indeed, was his purpose all along. The youth went to trial, was acquitted, thus proving yet again ‘white privilege’ and ‘racial inequality’ continue unabated in ‘systemically racist’ America.
The young man in question was Kyle Rittenhouse from Antioch, Illinois. For fifteen months, the above narrative was the continual drumbeat of the mainstream media and Democratic party. Presidential candidate Joe Biden had a campaign ad, narrated by Chris Wallace of Fox News, attacking President Donald Trump as a supporter of ‘white supremacists.’ It featured a photo of Rittenhouse with the gun, thus implying he was one.
With all the negative press, what really happened in Kenosha, Wisconsin on the night of 25 August 2020, which propelled Rittenhouse into international prominence?
Deceased Blacks: No! The two men who were killed by Rittenhouse, Joseph Rosenbaum 36 and Anthony Huber, 26, were both white. The third man, Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, was injured by Rittenhouse but survived and he, too, is white.
Crossing state lines: Antioch Illinois is only thirty-two kilometres from Kenosha. Rittenhouse did not ‘cross state lines’ with his AR-17 on that fateful night. His job and close relatives were in Kenosha. The gun itself was safely housed in the city – not brought in from Antioch.
Illegal gun: No! Under Wisconsin law, Rittenhouse was allowed to have the AR-17.
Pretext for Rioting – Jacob Blake: Did Rittenhouse come to confront a peaceful protest? No way. Kenosha was having a full blown riot and the pretext was the arrest and injury of a black man named Jacob Blake two nights before. Blake, an accused rapist, accosted a woman. Then he pulled a knife, tried to steal a vehicle with children inside, and resisted arrest. The police shot him. Investigations at the local and federal level examined the circumstances and concluded that the police shooting of Blake was justified. It had nothing to do with racism or police brutality. Yet, the media painted a picture of Blake being ‘unarmed’ and shot for no apparent reason, thus spawning the riots. The next night, rioters ran amok, creating mass damage and burning businesses to the ground. Price tag of the riots: $50 million in damage, more than half of Kenosha’s annual budget. Rittenhouse showed up the night after. Remember, America’s 2020 ‘summer of love’ was actually the ‘summer of George Floyd/BLM’ riots across the nation which killed eighteen people and caused $2 billion in damage.
Another lie: Jacob Blake was killed by the police – No, he is still alive though paralysed by his injuries
Rittenhouse Activities before the Shooting: Contrary to the notion that Rittenhouse, the ‘white supremacist,’ came to Kenosha to shoot peaceful BLM protestors, here’s the real story. He was already in Kenosha serving his shift as a life guard, where he was asked to clean off graffiti (there are photos to prove it). Rittenhouse was asked to stand guard and defend a man’s car dealership. The night before another dealership had one-hundred cars torched. Then, Kyle offered first aid to rioters. Finally, one of the rioters set fire to a dumpster and Rittenhouse tried to put it out. For some reason, the dousing of the dumpster fire triggered rioters; thus came Rosenbaum, Huber, and Grosskreutz to harm Rittenhouse.
An important point: Had the Kenosha police been properly supported, and if Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers accepted President Trump’s offer to send in the National Guard (he refused), there would have been no need for citizens like Kyle Rittenhouse to guard the dealership or carry a gun. In the absence of law and order, vigilante justice becomes necessary. As imperfect as this is, it sure beats totally mindless anarchy.
‘Ready to Kill’ Rioters: It wasn’t just Rittenhouse who was armed; guns were in abundance among the rioters. Rosenbaum, Huber, and Grosskreutz all tried to kill, or at least harm, Kyle. Rosenbaum shouted racist rants, threatened murder, and tried to grab his gun when he was fatally shot. Huber hit Rittenhouse with a skateboard before he was shot. Grosskreutz aimed his gun at Kyle, who fired first and hit his arm. All three men have a criminal record and Rittenhouse shot them in self-defence. There is ample high resolution video footage to prove it.
Racism: Even though Rittenhouse and his attackers, the prosecution, defence attorneys, and judge were all white, that did not stop the media and the Left from crying ‘racism.’ Any objective observer would conclude that race had nothing to do with it, considering the ‘whiteness’ of the main characters.
White Privilege: Regarding Rittenhouse’s ‘white privilege,’ remember that he turned himself into the police, was subject to nearly ninety days in jail before being bailed. Normally, clear evidence of self-defence would have closed the case without a trial. Yet Rittenhouse was forced to endure the most heinous campaign of insults, defamation and hatred from well-known elitists on a national scale. On top of that, he went through the glaring spotlight of a high profile trial. How many Americans of any colour had to experience what ‘white Rittenhouse’ did?
Kyle Rittenhouse: What was all the fuss? Why Does it Matter?
False narrative = False witness: The year 2020 was highly unstable, unpredictable, crisis-riddled, and subject to great shakings. The Covid-19 pandemic and lockdowns wreaked havoc in all areas of society. The death in Minneapolis of George Floyd in police custody triggered rioting and a crime wave across America. The goal of the political/cultural Left was to get rid of Donald Trump, no matter what the cost.
One tactic was to paint Trump, and his supporters, as white extremists. Kyle Rittenhouse, a white, mid-western, all-American teenager, became the poster boy of this leftist narrative. His prominence was a media creation meant to destroy the Trump presidency, even if it meant damaging an innocent young man in the process. Observers have credited mainstream media, more than any other source, as being the catalyst for the narrative, riots, instability, and slander.
For five years, this service has sought to emphasise the exceedingly strident nature of the ‘culture war’ between traditional values conservatives and left-wing progressivism/cultural Marxists. Traditionalists believe in faith, family, freedom, and the nation state while progressives want a utopian globalist world order of equity, inclusivity, and diversity.
Many left-wing activists are antagonist to the Judaeo-Christian values that made the West great. These include parliamentary democracy, separation of powers, balance of powers, self-government, rule of law, presumption of innocence, trial by jury, equality under the law, human rights, industrial revolutions, and more. The year 2020 exacerbated this conflict with its riots, disputed presidential election, and radicalising of the leftist parties (e.g. Jeremy Corbin in the British Labor party and Bernie Sanders in the American Democratic party).
The problem with ‘narratives’ is that they can be totally disconnected with reality, have a low view of truth, and are willing to ruin others in the process of achieving their goals. Like an idol, the narrative is open to deception and delusion.
2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 (ESV): “The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (emphasis mine).
If these verses don’t accurately describe our day – with its fables, fiction, and fairly tales – then what does?
The trial and acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse leads us to some important takeaways.
Benefit of the trial: Under normal circumstances – with clear evidence of self-defence – the Rittenhouse case would never have gone to trial. But because of the persistent cries of ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacy,’ Kenosha prosecutors may have felt obliged to take young Kyle to court. Imagine the trauma an eighteen year old faced going to court with the potential sentence of life in prison. On top of that, the entire country was watching with leftist pundits mercilessly slamming him on a regular basis.
Yet, there was a silver lining: it was in the trial that the truth came out and it varied radically from the media-induced narrative. It gave opportunity to present evidence, including the all-important video footage. Also, a composite picture of the tragedy was assembled like a jigsaw puzzle, with both sides contributing their pieces.
Nothing is sacred: While adult white Christian males are the main target of Leftist scorn, this hatred spreads to others who don’t share their doctrine. Blacks, women, and other minorities who hold conservative views experience the same derision as white men. As we have seen in recent years, even teenagers are viciously attack for being on the wrong side of the culture war. This includes Rittenhouse, Nicholas Sandmann, and young Barron, who was frequently ridiculed for living in the White House and having the ‘offensive surname of Trump.’
Guns and self-defence: The American republic was founded by people, many of them God-fearing, who believed that the Lord grants sacred rights like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The government’s role is to secure and protect those sacred rights; it does not invent or bestow them. While non-Americans cannot understand the Constitution’s Second Amendment, that guarantees citizens the right to keep and bear arms, it’s simple: America’s founders believed that God gave the right of self-defence and the government cannot take it away.
People Power: Though Rittenhouse had powerful opponents in the political / cultural / media elite, his acquittal defeated them all. This included the citizen journalists that took the video footage which vindicated him. One astute commentator said starkly that it was these truth-seeking citizen journalists who ‘saved Rittenhouse.’
Also, his jurors were normal Americans who, like Judge Bruce Schroeder, were under tremendous pressure to render a ‘guilty’ verdict or risk violence. Yet, they still saw that Rittenhouse shot in self-defence, took courage, and unanimously acquitted him. Truth triumphed in the end.
The Master’s Example
‘Glutton,’ ‘drunkard,’ ‘deceiver,’ ‘has a demon,’ ‘born of fornication,’ ‘works with the prince of the devils,’ ‘friend of publicans and sinners.’ Kyle Rittenhouse, verbally and viciously attacked, was in good company. Jesus of Nazareth experienced exactly the same thing – and much worse. If you only listened to His opponents, you would conclude he was a vile individual.
Of course, unlike Rittenhouse, Jesus of Nazareth was denied the presumption of innocence, trial by jury, due process, and rule of law, even though the Romans were in charge. His judge, the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate, knew he was innocent, he caved into the will of the mob and condemned Him to be executed. Jesus was crucified in the place of a proven robber and seditionist named Barabbas. His crime? King of the Jews.
Yet this most grotesque of injustices was allowed by Almighty God to fulfil the divine plan of world redemption. When the truth finally came out, we discover that Jesus Christ is the sinless Son of God who came to this planet to save us from our sins.
1 Peter 2:23 (KJV): “Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously”
We can debate whether we should own guns and exercise self-defence, but let us be clear that truth, justice, and God’s kingdom, will ultimately triumph in the end.
The Ninth Commandment 03: Winning the battle for Truth
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour — Exodus 20:16
The ninth commandment is not just a prohibition against lying and false witness; it is a manifesto on truth itself. In order to win the battle for truth, we also need to compare it with the different aspects of falsehood have infiltrated our language, culture, and society at large today.
So far, we learned about double-speak, spin, mendacity, and ‘smoke and mirrors.’ Here’s a few more tenets of falsehood:
Half-truth: An interesting and deadly variant of the virus of lies. One could be telling a story that is technically factual but the spirit behind it is evil. With half-truths, presentation of ‘facts’ is not given to shed light, as truth does, but to obscure it. For example, ’tell-all biographies’ may actually be reporting ‘facts’ but the question needs to be asked: Why are they telling us these things? Is it for the public good? Does it bring accountability? Does it shed light? Will it make our society better? Or is their real intention to embarrass, harass, or even destroy a public figure? If the latter, then it really should be labelled as a violation of the ninth commandment.
A good rule of thumb against half-truth: If the words are true but the spirit behind it is false, then it is wrong … no matter how accurate the wording may be. Remember, a positive (factual accuracy) and a negative (spirit of defamation and destruction) equals a negative. Only when the facts are true and the spirit behind them is good will you hear the truth.
A good example of ‘half truth,’ ‘right words, wrong spirit,’ was the girl with the spirit of divination in Acts 16. She followed Paul and Silas while declaring “These men are the servants of the most high God, which shew unto us the way of salvation.” There was no untruth in her statement; however, she kept following and harassing the apostles with this unwanted ‘commendation.’ Inspired by an evil spirit, her words were vexatious to Paul and the Holy Spirit; thus he cast out the spirit from her and she was set free (Acts 16:16-18).
Gaslighting: This is particularly insidious. It is a form of manipulation, often incessant, to cause a person to doubt their sanity, memory, perception and judgement. A good example was the 2005 movie called Flightplan, starring Jodie Foster. In the film Foster boarded a plane with her daughter, who simply vanished during the flight. The flight attendants and passengers all denied ever seeing the daughter on the flight. Her name was not even on the passenger list! Foster was about to go crazy, doubting her own sanity. Eventually, she found her daughter in the hold of the plane.
Post-Truth Age: An often used phrase that speaks of shaping public opinion from universal objective truth to personalised, subjective, and emotional truth. It fractures reality into tiny pieces.This is a recipe for societal destabilisation and anarchy.
Relativism: This is a hallmark of postmodernism. The New Oxford American Dictionary defines it as: “The doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute.” Relativism can only be true if there were no timeless, universal truth that applies to all people at all times. From a Biblical perspective, we know that this notion is false. God’s truth is for all people, all time, all places.
Lying is the bedrock of evil; it is the devil’s mother tongue. The good news is that God’s truth – universal, enduring, liberating – is readily available. Through Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, and the Word of God, you have access to the full gamut of divine universal eternal truth. Receive and retain His truth and you will be set free (John 8:32).
In our next article on the ninth commandment, we will listen to the prophetic warnings from Jesus and Paul.
TO BE CONTINUED
Are the Magi (Wise Men) Part of the Christmas Story?
It is a familiar and welcome scene during the Christmas season. Three men, with a star above them and camels beneath, rode from the East and came to visit the Christ child. In order to meet the new-born infant, they had to crowd into the ‘maternity barn’ full of shepherds and livestock. Many an olive wood nativity scene has replicated this setting millions of time.
This Christmas, we want to explore the story of the wise men and their divinely appointed visit with the young Jesus. While we are respectful of tradition, we are even more respectful regarding what is written in God’s Word.
Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him. When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him Matthew 2:1-3
Background: A little background information would be helpful. The land of Israel was under Persian and Hellenistic rule during the 400 year period between the end of the Old Testament (Malachi) and beginning of the New (Matthew).
Around 164 BC the Jewish people became autonomous under the Maccabee / Hasmoneans. Yet they were so disunited and prone to internal feuding that a century later Rome stepped in 63 BC to stop the squabbling. Once they took over, Rome would not leave. They appointed Herod as ‘King of the Jews’ around 40 BC.
At that time Judaea was invaded by the Parthians, predecessors to the modern Iranians. They were a chief rival to Rome and a thorn in its side. Judaea was a buffer state between the two enemies. Herod, newly-installed, had to flee to Alexandria until Rome retook the country in 37 BC.
It was at this point his reign began in earnest. Though he built the Jews the magnificent temple in Jerusalem – the one Jesus knew – they loathed their puppet king and would happily work with the Parthians or anyone else who would overthrow him.
Magi & Herod: Knowing these facts will help you understand Herod’s crazed reaction. The wise men, known as magoi in Greek, came from the East. The most likely place of origin was Persia / Parthia, which had the Zoroastrian religion. It believed in one God Ahura Mazda and was superficially similar to Judaism. We don’t know their names, though in the sixth century AD three names emerged: Balthasar, Melchior, and Gaspar.
The Biblical text says that when the wise men arrived, Herod was troubled and all Jerusalem with him. How could three men on camels be considered a threat? That answer: they can’t. These wise men were high officials, if not ‘three kings,’ and they probably came with an armed escort of dozens, perhaps hundreds of men. Herod, a paranoid man in the best of times, well remembered his near escape from the Parthian invasion of 40 BC and this large contingent from Persia would have no doubt spooked him. One false move and the ‘wise men’ and their guards, coupled by many Herod-hating Jews, could have overthrown him.
Yet the purpose of their visit was not for war but for worship. The wise man paid a courtesy call to Herod, being the host of the land, and asked of him a simple question: where is He who was born king of the Jews? Whether this was an innocent inquiry or calculated insult is not easy to say. But what is for sure was that Herod, the able administrator, master builder, and obsessively anxious puppet king, was highly incensed. Despite all the trappings of royalty, he knew in his heart of hearts that he really was not the legitimate king of Israel. The young child now became his greatest rival yet.
Of course, Herod was not Biblically literate, so he had to find out from the scholars where Messiah would be born. They gave him an immediate answer: In Bethlehem of Judaea, a mere ten kilometres from his Jerusalem palace. How did they know? The prophet Micah said so seven hundred years earlier in his famous passage Micah 5:2. So Herod dispatched the Magi to Bethlehem. Before they left, Herod asked them to return and tell him where Christ was located so he could worship Him, too. It was a deadly lie.
At this point, we realise that the Magi probably need not bother Herod at all. Like a supernatural ‘GPS,’ the ‘Star of Bethlehem’ lead them from the East was poised to lead them all the way to Messiah. While there are some famous mentions of stars in Scripture, one commentator said that the ‘Star of the King of the Jews’ (Matthew 2:2) was probably God’s shekinah glory, courtesy of the Holy Spirit.
Here’s where the story gets a little tricky so we need to balance the narrative in the Gospel of Matthew with that found in Luke’s Gospel. In Luke 2:39, within days of Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem, He was presented in the temple. From there the holy family returned with the infant to their home in Nazareth of Galilee. No mention of the flight to Egypt, which happened much later.
Matthew 2:11 says the wise men came into a ’house,’ not a barn or cave with a manger. Joseph and Mary were unlikely to have a house in Bethlehem, if they had one, they would not sought accommodation in a cave since there was ‘no room at the inn’ – Luke 2:7. So where did the holy family have a ‘house?’ Nazareth.
Therefore where did the Magi’s visit occur?
“When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was” — Matthew 2:9.
The star took them to the exact location of the holy child. While the Bible is silent on the precise location, it had to be with a house. With that criterion, Nazareth may be the more likely location than Bethlehem.
And ‘when’ did the visit occur? Herod’s murderous rampage against the male toddlers of the Bethlehem region, “ … from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men” — Matthew 2:16ff. So Jesus could have been a year and a half or two years old when the famous visit occurred.
Wherever the visit happened, the wise men gave their gifts directly to the young Jesus and worshipped Him wholeheartedly. Frankly, the only reason we say, ‘three wise men’ is because three gifts were given: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Gold stands for royalty, incense is for divinity, and myrrh for embalming the dead. After their historic visit, they returned to the East another way, ignoring Herod altogether. As a result, the mad monarch felt mocked and swore to kill all male toddlers in the Bethlehem region, two years old or younger. So the holy family escaped to Egypt and possibly supported themselves by the gold Jesus received. They stayed put until they heard the news that Herod was dead (Matthew 2:15).
It is not our intention to spoil anyone’s Christmas or dismiss their nativity scene, but the chances are very high that the visit of the Magi did not happen at the time of Christ’s birth, they did not meet the shepherds of Bethlehem, nor is it likely that they gave their worship and gifts in Bethlehem.
At the same time, we strongly affirm that the visit of the Magi did occur and is a valued part of the Biblical narrative. With this in mind, let us remember that oft quoted motto:
Wise men still seek Him!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year’s.
Has Australia Gone Covid-Mad? Part 02
In Part 01, we learned that the world is alarmed by Australia’s response to Covid-19. Is this warranted? In Part 02, we will look at some of the reasons for the Covid-19 response, mostly in Australia, but also the greater world scene.
While ‘lockdowns’ and ‘vaccine mandates’ are not unique to Australia, it is the seeming overreaction and strong-armed tactics that have the world gasping. Such actions were once reserved for totalitarian regimes run by illiberal despots. Now they are happening in a parliamentary democracy, once part of the free world, serving and representing the people.
However, the latest reports out of Australia are sobering: the rise quarantine camps. One camp at Howard Springs, Northern Territory, is currently housing people, including those who do not have Covid-19, but were exposed to someone who does. Queensland does not want to be left behind. It is building two ‘Wellcamps,’ with an undisclosed amount of taxpayer money, that will house up to 1,500 people. The putative purpose is to avoid further lockdowns. Built next to a local airport near Toowoomba, but not near a tertiary hospital, the federal government is supporting one of the camps. Even an Australian senator, Alex Antic, was housed in a camp. Fines of AUD 5,000 are levied against anyone who goes beyond their veranda without a mask.
If we are going to solve a problem, first of all, we have to understand what is the problem and why. Once this is done, you are halfway towards the solution.
What factors have determined Australia’s heavy-handed Covid response?
Irrationality: Why was it that seventy percent of the nation was locked down at one time for under two-hundred Covid cases nationally? Even Tasmania contemplated lockdown, though it had zero cases! It is the fear factor – and fear causes irrationality. Another country that, ‘freaked out’ over Covid (a phrase used by their own media) was Israel, which almost killed its lucrative tourist industry in its feverish attempt to stamp out the virus.
Media: Criticising the media as ‘fake news’ has become a blood sport. Yet because of their influence over society they apparently played a role in Australia’s Covid response. They have been accused of overstating the dangers, criticising the restrictive state and national government for not going far enough, and ridiculing those who protested for their freedom. Omitting information that should be public knowledge is also a problem; it is also failure to uphold journalistic standards.
Progressivism: This century-old political theory, which believes big government to ‘solve our problems’ and ‘meet our needs’ philosophy, is very strong in both major political parties and throughout the organs of society (media, education, entertainment, and judiciary). With the notion of ‘government knows best,’ the temptation to become coercive is ever-present. It is no coincidence, that more progressive state governments in Australia, like blue states in America, are generally more Covid restrictive.
Power grab: Like money, power is highly coveted, and addictive. Once seized, it is hard to let go. Some political leaders are sincerely concerned for the people’s welfare and believe their policies are for their good. Yet others, whether local political leaders or globalists, are motivated to increase power by exaggerating and exploiting a public health emergency. The recently passed Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management Bill 2021) in Victoria is considered an enshrinement of unchecked power, even though the government claims there are safeguards; the Victorian Bar Association is not convinced. Thousands have protested in Melbourne against this bill, which increases executive power and proposed heavy fines for violation (individuals $22,000, business $109,000, breaching quarantine is $90,500 and/or two years in prison. This is a serious threat to democracy. Professor David Flint says: ‘There was never, and there is now, absolutely no justification in overriding democratic rights for the sake of health restrictions.’
Isolationism: Australia, the island continent, has understandably been careful about imports and quarantines so as not to endanger its unique ecosystem, flora and fauna. Apparently, during the 1956 Olympic ‘Friendly Games’ in Melbourne, the city was not so friendly to the equestrian competition. The horse races were held in Sweden instead of Australia! Yet, to hermeneutically seal Australia from the outside world, and even each other, is unhealthy and dangerous. A return to normalcy and common sense precautions is in order.
Bureaucracy: The United States government employs millions of civil servants, including administrative ‘experts,’ whose regulations have the force of law. This is the case even though no one voted them in! According to the US Constitution, Congress alone is the law-making branch of government. However, it was Congress decades ago who delegated their law-making power to the bureaucrats. The US Supreme Court, sworn to uphold the Constitution, has apparently gone along with this arrangement in past rulings. The administrative state is strongly progressivist and clearly undemocratic. In an emergency, these ‘experts’ who claim to ‘follow the science,’ are dictating to the politicians and the people ‘the way things should be.’ Politicians are happy for these ‘eternal tenured’ bureaucrats to make the decisions and take the blame if things of wrong. If Australia’s bureaucracy is similar to the United States, then Covid has virtually invited abuse of power. This elite class designed regulations and restrictions from which they personally are insulated.
Apathy and acquiescence: Many Australians accepted lockdowns, masks, and restrictions as being short-term and helpful. But as the ‘Give us two weeks to stop the spread’ became open ended and ongoing, how long will the public tolerate this? Victoria’s police have been accused of brutality in confronting lockdown protestors (while apparently tolerating BLM protestors and even ‘taking the knee’). It is important to get the facts first, reject disinformation, and, if brutality did happen, it needs to be confronted.
Culture War fallout: The on-going ‘culture war’ between secular progressives and cultural Marxists — The Left — versus traditional values conservatives — The Right, has been in overdrive during the last few years. Nerves are raw and emotions high. Therefore, it is easy for both sides to respond, act, and overreact to allegations of tyranny, whether real or imagined. We need to do our utmost to get the facts and not jump to hasty and inaccurate conclusions.
Next time, we will look at some positive thing we can do to turn the tide.
Kairos: the card player
Is waiting now our greatest calling, like Simeon and Anna who grasped the moment of kairos joy?
The Tracker, Ten Canoes and Charlie’s Country
With the passing yesterday of renowned actor, dancer, singer and painter David Dalaithngu AM, we republish Katherine Rainger’s 2019 Zadok review of his collaborative works with Rolf de Heer. Dalaithngu was one of the first Aboriginal characters portrayed on the big screen.